Jump to content

MarkF

Members
  • Posts

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by MarkF

  1. On 8/10/2023 at 2:47 PM, Marcos said:

    This has been already asked above or elsewhere, the option to select remote host and port will be available in v17.

    But why would you release such unfinished state of application and essentially make beta testers out of users while removing expected functionality until some time in the future you say?! Makes zero sense to treat users like that.

  2. Why in interactive firewall popup we can't select IPs and ports anymore when making a rule that have values based on connection attempt that triggered popup?

    All that is available is "Apply to child processes" and "edit rule before saving" which opens another window in which there are no values for local and remote IPs and ports.

    This is so disastrous both as bad UI/UX with additional clicks needed and as functionality that has been removed as if ESET is trying to actively prevent users from using Interactive firewall by making it unusable.

    Unbelievable they would push this drastic change.

  3. Today I started getting firewall popups (since I have it set on interactive to prompt any new communication attempt) regarding "msmpeng.exe" outgoing communication to Microsoft that I haven't seen in the past. Then I went to check Windows Defender Security Center where it says actions are needed... regarding firewall issues (I guess I didn't set the msmpeng.exe process to allow) where I also noticed Defender was turned on.

    Should Windows Defender be turned on while having ESET installed or not? Even if yes, Is it needed at all, can it be disabled and is that not recommeneded?

    Here is the screenshot. There are no actions needed inside ESET of course.

    Cjb2rKS.png

     

  4. Even though it is possible that something else is a matter I'm not inclined to think it's other software than ESET and/or Windows 10 CU because I'm very meticulous about observing what is happening with my computer and the only variables changed since these BSODs started happening were ESET and Win10 CU upgrade. Having in mind I completely formatted disk and reinstalled Win10 CU that narrows down the possibility and likelihood of rogue driver doing it.

    Considering examining minidumps, and googling few terms always bring me into connection to ESET in my search I'm very much inclined to think it's connected to ESET.

  5. Unfortunately both that and disabling SSL filtering will take time to test if BSODs happen.

    Another thing is that disabling HIPS brings notifications that protection is not secure enough which is really annoying. People hate to see tray icon showing something is wrong + getting notifications how ~"you should really enable xxx protection because you are not protected enough."

  6. I'm on Windows 10 pro CU 64bit and I have done measurement using Measure-Command {Start-Process powershell} | Select TotalSeconds command. It consistently takes around 5 or 5.1 seconds to start. After uninstalling ESET it took 0.01 seconds to start measured by same command. Now, I tried adding powershell.exe to exclusions but I just cant make it run without taking 5 seconds under ESET.

    Any advice how to exclude powershell from scanning so that it starts fast?

    P.S. This is measurement under ESET EJVe4WX.png

     

    and this is measurement after uninstalling ESET kVCWaWt.png

  7. I have ESET Internet Security v10.1.204.0 x64 on Windows 10. Every few days, sometimes more often I get BSOD in Windows 10 CU about BAD_POOL_CALLER 0x000000c2. I've searched around and got to this link 

    I'm thinking this is related to ESET and very well could be related to their firewall, as suggested doing this SSL filtering. Has this been confirmed by ESET? Can they look into this? I can provide minidump if necessary. I run firewall in interactive mode.

×
×
  • Create New...