• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


MSE last won the day on May 29

MSE had the most liked content!

About MSE

  • Rank
  1. Personally I like to see such postings which make people aware . The "process" is a hidden one, which can induce a false feeling of security. 0xDEADBEEF , keep up the good work.
  2. On VT this file is being detected by 22 engines; sure enough ESET is NOT one of them.
  3. And we have to believe you , .....why? What is the "Face" value of such statement???? Welcome or not, facts are facts! When you have Avast! (free) , Avira (free) , Bitdefender (free) ,MSE (free) with a higher detection rate than ESET, one may ask why do we have to pay , when the free alternatives offer better protection????
  4. This is not a "made" test to fit MSE, is a test performed by AV comparatives , a reputable company, and all players had the same chance to prove their detection rate. Leaving MSE alone, from Feb to June ,ESET is on 16th place from 21, with 7 antiviruses having 100% detection. As an ESET developer, I fell for you, but the reality is that ESET is no longer what it used to be. Thanks,
  5. And why is that??? Feb to June 2017 .......MSE 98.8% ESET 98.5% June 2017 ...... MSE 100% ESET 98% May 2017 MSE 99.5% ESET 97.7% Apr 2017 MSE 99.3% ESET 98.7% "You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time."
  6. ESET:99.1% MSE: 99.7%
  7. Hi Marcos, I installed NOD 32 , v8.304 and I tried to open :hxxp:// I did not get any reaction from NOD32, the site opened normally. By contrast , when I use Bitdefender Free , I get this (see attachment) Any comments?
  8. Do you have a detection for :hxxp:// The screenshot provided is from March 30, 2017
  9. Maybe OP is right; When I try to access :hxxp://, Bitdefender blocks access to the site; if I insist in going there , the following detection appears (see attachment)
  10. I very much doubt this, as ESET was among a few not detecting this, at that specific time. I am still eager to see a ransomware detected by the dedicated ransomware module from v10.
  11. Detection ratio for this particular ransomware was 35/63. Hard to believe that 35 antivirus solutions have auto backup capabilities. ESET (paid) performed the same as Avast! (free), MSE (free), Kingsoft (free), AVG (free), ....
  12. I do not understand why "exposure" is so important , as long as ESET v10 has DEDICATED ANTIRANSOMWARE module. If ESET still bases its detection on a signature update and waits for the "sample" to be submitted, what's the point of the dedicated antiransomware module?????
  13. Hi Tom, Totally agree with you! Try to stay with version 8 as long as possible, but there is a constant push to version 10 , as being the best thing since sliced bread....
  14. Show me ONE detection initiated by the Antiransomware module in ESET v10.In the recent ransomware attack, some other modules reacted. I several years of using ESET , I never had an alert initiated by HIPS module In the end of the day, this is the reality: MSE, a free antivirus, scored 100%, better than some paid.