Why is RanSim treated as a legitimate program and who makes that determination? ESET? What value is there to doing that?
I'm frustrated by a reoccurring theme of, "You can't use a test to test because we know it is a test." when I ask why ESET totally fails to detect a threat that even Windows Defender stops at least part of.
Do you have supporting data that shows where ESET outperforms the competition when they are in the same ransomware scenario?
Troy