Azure Phoenix

I see.Thanks.

So, what happened? Is the issue going to get fixed?

Only recall Webroot doing this.

Since no one has replied here. Try going to the appropriate sub-forum for your device and see if anyone has the same issue you do. https://forum.eset.com/forum/28-eset-products-for-mobile-devices/

Did you checked if uBlock isn't blocking part of the website? Perhaps that's the reason why ESET isn't detecting phishing there.

Have you tried installing the home version of ESET instead of endpoint?

Does this mean features like banking don't work on Edge? I remember the feature always worked with Chrome despite enabling appcontainer in it. Though, I wonder if the banking feature was changing the Chrome process to untrusted.

From the link TomFace posted 23. Why is there no ESET product available for Windows Phone and Apple iOS (iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch)? Windows Phone and Apple iOS are proprietary operating systems with their own application stores. The only way to install software on your device is through these stores. Publishers verify each application and guarantee it is malware free. The applications from these stores cannot be run in the background, nor can they scan and delete other programs. Additionally, each application runs in its own segment– a sandbox–so that even if there is any malware bundled in with an application, it cannot be installed and spread to other programs.

Perhaps a good alternative for those wanting MBAM web protection, would be its extension for Chrome and Firefox. would assume those won't conflict with ESET.

Exclusions are a function in your product. Those possibles security holes are already there. So, why not improve the way exclusions are done like above?

You can also try alternatives. For example qBittorent.

ESET already has machine learning. It's called Augur https://www.welivesecurity.com/2017/06/20/machine-learning-eset-road-augur/ They already did many articles of the subject of ML.

Malwaretips offer a Malware Hub section where users spent time testing security products. As far as I'm aware one of the rules there is to submit missed samples to the antivirus provider you are testing. Of course one has to wait for someone to actually test ESET.

I assume this might have something to do with DNA signature https://www.eset.com/int/about/technology/ "Detection types range from very specific hashes to ESET DNA Detections, which are complex definitions of malicious behavior and malware characteristics."

That's why the title says 'under the hood'

Thought websites had to be excluded like this www.sportshd.me/*

Try uBlock with dynamic filtering. And try to block the ads on all websites.

Isn't that the job of the HIPS?

The fact it says "secured environment" makes me think of a sandbox. @Marcos can correct me if I'm wrong.

@camelia You mean the banking feature? I thought it already used its own sandbox.

If one uses a security product, it is understandable to want to know if it works and how. Safe habits plus knowing the strength and weaknesses(limitations) of a product is good. Do you know if Norton is injecting dll into processes to monitor them?

One thing I have noticed from dedicated anti-exploit products is that they inject dll into various processes most likely to monitor their behavior for possible exploitation. However if one checks with Process Explorer you hardly see any dll from ESET. At most, you can see dll in browsers like Chrome and Firefox but those are for the Banking feature. So, I'm going to assume to whatever technology ESET uses for its anti-exploit capabilities are different from the standard.

I'm curious. Did you used a 32-bit application for the test? If so, could you say which one?

I believe you meant firewall rules. HIPS supports wildcards, the firewall doesn't.

What about Gryphon? Is it true it uses technology from ESET? https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180323005543/en/Gryphon-Brings-ESET-Enterprise-Network-Protection-Homes Discussion about the product https://malwaretips.com/threads/gryphon-the-worlds-most-powerful-ai-router.85278/